• Thursday, November 12th 2020 at 16:00 - 17:00 UK (Other timezones)
  • General participation info   |   Participate online   |   + Phone in United States (Toll Free): 1 877 309 2073 United States: +1 (571) 317-3129 Australia (Toll Free): 1 800 193 385 Australia: +61 2 8355 1020 Austria (Toll Free): 0 800 202148 Belgium (Toll Free): 0 800 78884 Canada (Toll Free): 1 888 455 1389 Denmark (Toll Free): 8090 1924 France (Toll Free): 0 805 541 047 Germany (Toll Free): 0 800 184 4222 Greece (Toll Free): 00 800 4414 3838 Hungary (Toll Free): (06) 80 986 255 Iceland (Toll Free): 800 9869 Ireland (Toll Free): 1 800 946 538 Israel (Toll Free): 1 809 454 830 Italy (Toll Free): 800 793887 Japan (Toll Free): 0 120 663 800 Luxembourg (Toll Free): 800 22104 Netherlands (Toll Free): 0 800 020 0182 New Zealand (Toll Free): 0 800 47 0011 Norway (Toll Free): 800 69 046 Poland (Toll Free): 00 800 1213979 Portugal (Toll Free): 800 819 575 Spain (Toll Free): 800 900 582 Sweden (Toll Free): 0 200 330 905 Switzerland (Toll Free): 0 800 740 393 United Kingdom (Toll Free): 0 800 169 0432 Access Code: 731-636-357

One in three patients relapse after antidepressant discontinuation within six months, and there is little guidance for clinicians or patients on how and when discontinuation is safe. Identification of relapse predictors hence constitutes an urgent clinical problem.

In a longitudinal randomized observational prognostic two-site study (AIDA), remitted patients on antidepressants were assessed using a broad battery of clinical interviews, questionnaires, neuroimaging and behavioral tasks before antidepressant discontinuation, and followed up for six months to assess relapse. Half of the sample was assessed a second time after discontinuation, half twice before discontinuation. For the examined variables, we computed the balanced accuracy of correctly classifying patients as relapsers or non-relapsers out-of-sample.

123 patients were included of which 30 finished the study with a relapse and 52 without. Here, we report the results from four analyses. 1) Clinical and demographic variables did not predict subsequent relapse better than chance. 2) However, EEG-alpha asymmetry during a sad mood induction predicted relapse with a balanced accuracy of 0.7. 3) Furthermore, patients invested less for reward in a physical effort task and subsequent relapsers took longer to decide which option to choose. The development and application of a generative computational model for this decision-making process based on value-based and drift-diffusion models allowed us to identify that the former result is due to increasJed effort sensitivity in patients and the later to a higher boundary in relapsers. The higher decision times predicted relapse in the main (0.66) and in a validation sample (0.71). 4) Resting-state functional connectivity did not predict relapse prior to discontinuation, but connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the parietal cortex changed due to discontinuation and predicted relapse with a balanced accuracy of 0.86 in patients who were also assessed after discontinuation.

In summary, several markers of relapse after antidepressant discontinuation might, if confirmed in larger replication studies, be useful in a clinical setting.

 

 

 

 

 

Isabel Berwian, PhD

Postdoctoral Researcher
Nivlab
Princeton Neuroscience Institute
Princeton University

Isabel Berwian – Computational approaches to identify mechanisms underlying antidepressant discontinuation and predictors of subsequent relapse